Friday, May 8, 2009

Masculinity and Pornography

By: Marc
I am sitting in the dining facility here minding my own business, too lost in the root beer float I'd made to worry about anything surrounding me ...when I was tapped on the shoulder by another soldier, pointing out to me a conventional good-looking airman who had just walked by. Already, soldiers sitting at my table are talking about what they'd like to do to her."That's nice," I said, getting back to my root beer float.

"Sergeant, when it comes to talking about women, you're at the level of a 7th-grader," a soldier told me, then went back to talking about the woman.My unresolved masculinity almost got the best of me; I wanted to defend my manhood by talking about the women I've been with in the past - and join in on the conversations, as if somehow it would prove that I am, indeed, a man.But my feminism got the best me and rather than joining in the exercise of objectification, I kept quiet.

On the walk back, however, I began to think about the incident, and what the soldier had meant when he, because of my refusal to join in to an obvious male-bonding moment of objectifying women, equated misogyny with manhood. Perhaps I should have been insulted; but perhaps, just perhaps, the world would be a more equal, pleasant place where women weren't objectified and raped if everyman were to look at women through the eyes of a 7th-grader. After all, as children, we saw our opposite genders as equals and friends.

For the most part - and as long back as I can remember, boys and girls go along. There were no such things as misogyny, and groups of boys never sat around and insulted groups of girls or turned them into objects.As children, boys also looked up to their mothers, believing them to be the women who could do anything; not only did they look to their mothers for comfort and care, but these young boys, and I remember my days as a boy, genuinely loved their mothers, without regard as to their gender.

So, what changed? Where along the road to adulthood do males turn from loving, respectful boys to men who objectify? What are the social forces and rites of passage that turned them from lovers to objectifiers? To be sure, not all men objectify, but those who do objectify, it seems, assert more "masculinity" than those who do not.For me, the masculinity can be attributed to several thing - and porn being among them. After all, pornography is almost every boy's rite-of-passage.

This means, then, that on masculinity, the objectification of women and the consumption of porn go hand-in-hand. That is, where porn paints the picture of women as always readily available, always desiring the same types of sex men want, and never saying no, it also turns women into an accessory. Rather than an equal partnership where sex and pleasure are negotiated and shared, porn makes men assume that he can have sex with women whenever, however and wherever.Further, as boys and young men sit around in front of a television screen, viewing pictures of women in various stages of sexual conducts, the one thing that's removed from porn is the humanity of sex. Thus, at a young age, men are conditioned to believe not only are women there to pleasure them, but that there is no emotion in sex.

It's no wonder why some men can readily objectify and rape women. After all, if women are viewed as 'less-than-humans,' and if it's assumed that all women want sex all the time and that no women ever says no, then the protestations of women mean very little, and further, even when women are drunk and unresponsive, the man would assume (having been conditioned to do so) that she wants sex. Add this to the belief that sex defines a man and the result is what we see everyday - young men, fueled by their own beliefs in masculinity, objectifying and raping women - often without knowing what they're doing is wrong.

So what's the solution here? To be sure, it's not censorship; but I do believe the feminist movement needs more male presence. Often times, we focus on ensuring that young girls have role models who teach them the values of being strong and assertive, yet, even in our movement, we lack the male presence to teach young men to deconstruct their masculinity and deal with women not as objects, but fellow human beings.

Further, given that the major source of women's oppressions and plights are the actions of men, there also needs to be more focus on men's studies - that is, how men fit within patriarchy and what gender roles require of them. After all, if men's actions are causing women pain, then we need to figure why men are taking those actions.

While there are resources out there (the National Organization for Men Against Sexism @ www.nomas.org, as an example), they are far and few between - and if we want to take the next step into not only empowering girls and women, but also teaching boys and men to be loving, caring human beings toward women and themselves, then we need to include them in on not just the social justice movement, but also the academic movement. After all, not only are women's humanities, but also the humanities of men, are depended on it.

1 comments:

paledamiana said...

This post opens up a few topics that are at the center of discourse in many women’s studies classes.
First, I appreciate your perspective, Marc, on how it is to be a male child. For a female child, this experience differs (as your personal childhood may differ from other males, my childhood differs from other females but I bring this perspective from common themes of female experience in personal narratives). My childhood was always subject to masculine comments & groping. I recall elementary school leers as I walked to the store in my neighborhood. I was often groped in junior high, even in 7th grade. There are many accounts of female children being subject to molestation, my experience happened before 7th grade. I think the innocence of childhood is taken away much younger for females than males in general society. The points you raise coincides to the female experience, but it happens much younger than you think.
I think placing blame on pornography is a blanket of blame for misogyny. There is porn that is demeaning to women and objectifies women, I agree. There isn’t the totalitarian position that porn causes all objectified ills. Porn has evolved to honor sexuality and sensuality in many genres. Feminist porn is made by women to honor women’s sexuality. It presents all forms of female bodies – gender queer, dyke, boi, femme – any experience that originates from a female-bodied person. How refreshing to have a visual representation of female bodies that isn’t the silicone induced, uber-female that makes up the majority of porn. Feminist porn isn’t the only example of sexually positive visualization. Transgender porn shows that the journeys of some aren’t as linear as we expect our journeys to be. This isn’t in denial of the existence of misogynistic porn; it is acknowledgment that porn cannot be generalized to be the cause of ills. I acknowledge the studies that have shown porn to increase certain physiological responses etc. There is a cumulative effect when it comes to violence and there is a disservice when porn is used as the sole cause of violence. I do not agree with violent porn; there is the extreme of very demeaning movies made. I am thankful that I do have choices and adore that I can be shown experiences that fit more with my life. Last time I looked in the mirror I was far from a blond, blue eyed 42DD woman.
When porn and rape are presented as cause/effect, the idea of rape as sexual is reinforced. Rape is an act of violence. Even if a woman does want sex all the time, that has no correlation of a man/woman violating her and raping her. Rape is not sex. I do not see a drunk, unresponsive female and think yes I want to have sex with her. A person that does and chooses to is not having sex, he/she is raping her – they are violating her body. Rape needs to stop being associated with sex, perhaps that should be the first lesson in a male perspective class.
Feminism does need the presence of males; humanity is made of different genders and to bring humanistic progress requires a collaborative effort on all gender identities. The movement of women’s studies in an academic setting has brought an opening of the patriarchal lens that we are conditioned from birth to view this world. There are men’s studies on certain campus to investigate the reasons behind misogynistic behavior from the male gender. There is a need for progressive men to teach and be examples for the next generation. Feminism has brought these perspectives to the scholars immersed within a women’s studies curriculum. Some have argued that it should be called gender studies to encapsulate all gender identities since opening of the lens brings a macroscopic view of the global construct. I, personally, am warmed by the honor that the title women’s studies brings to the female experience that has been tampered for so long. It happens that through the study of the female experience that we open our eyes to the other half of the truth.
So what is the answer? Always debatable. What would a men’s studies program bring that a women’s studies program doesn’t already have? An honoring of men’s experience? Isn’t that what we are fed from birth? The history books are written from a white male perspective. Is it against the present male code to be immersed in women’s studies since it lifts the idea of women up? Is it demasculinizing to be in a woman space that one would need a separate man’s space to study a new lens on the male experience?
As long as we have these debates and share all perspectives, the progression of human kind will embrace all the experiences we have – regardless of what term we use.

Search The Phem Pages

Loading...


Phem.org on Facebook

Preview The First Issue!

Write For Phem!


Phem is always seeking talented, witty, informative writers who want to discuss what issues are most relevant within our society. Contact Brook at phemmag@gmail.com